Search for:
LOGIN/JOIN
  • Consumer Resources
    • Find an Attorney
    • Blog Posts
    • Helpful Links
    • James E. Beckley Scholarship
  • Member Resources
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Tiers
    • Upcoming Events Calendar
    • Expert Advertising
  • About PIABA
    • Background
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events Calendar
    • Contact Us
    • Donate To PIABA
  • News/Advocacy
    • News Articles
    • Press Releases
    • Blog
    • Advocacy
      • Briefs
      • Comment Letters
      • Reports & Op Eds
Find an Attorney Upcoming Events
LOGIN/JOIN
  • Consumer Resources
    • Find an Attorney
    • Blog Posts
    • Helpful Links
    • James E. Beckley Scholarship
  • Member Resources
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Tiers
    • Upcoming Events Calendar
    • Expert Advertising
  • About PIABA
    • Background
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events Calendar
    • Contact Us
    • Donate To PIABA
  • News/Advocacy
    • News Articles
    • Press Releases
    • Blog
    • Advocacy
      • Briefs
      • Comment Letters
      • Reports & Op Eds
Find an Attorney Upcoming Events

Fuss Over Broker Expungement Continues, by Kristen French

Published on: January 29, 2008
Read More

Disclosure rules contain loophole, by Dan Jamieson

Published on: January 14, 2008
Read More

PRESS RELEASE: Investors’ Negative View of Arbitration Supports Need for Reforms, Laurence S. Schultz, 2008 PIABA President

Published on: January 11, 2008 Tags: Press Release
Read More

AMICUS BRIEF: Robert J. Boyer v. Salmon Smith Barney, Dean Michael Howell and Dean K. Morrell, Brief of Amicus Curiae Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association, TC No. 0212-12721, CA A123799, SC No. S055192

Published on: January 10, 2008 Tags: Amicus Brief
Read More

COMMENT LETTER: NASAA Model Rule on the Use of Senior-Specific Certifications and Professional Designations (December 14, 2007)

Published on: December 14, 2007 Tags: Comment Letter
Read More

CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY: Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Constitution. Hearing on S. 1782, The Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007 (December 12, 2007)

Published on: December 12, 2007 Tags: Congressional Testimony and Letters
Read More

PRESS RELEASE: PIABA Supports Feingold Johnson Proposal to Ban Mandatory Arbitration, Laurence S. Schultz, 2008 PIABA President (December 12, 2007)

Published on: December 12, 2007 Tags: Press Release
Read More

AMICUS BRIEF: Melanie Senter Lubin, Maryland Securities Commissioner v. Joseph R. Karsner, IV, et al. No. 07-7080, in Support of Appellant, On Appeal from the District Court for the District of Columbia (Richard J. Leon, Judge)

Published on: November 21, 2007 Tags: Amicus Brief
Read More

PRESS RELEASE: PIABA Supports Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007, Laurence S. Schultz, 2008 PIABA President

Published on: October 31, 2007 Tags: Press Release
Read More

Industry arbitrators: We’re the good guys, Dan Jamieson

Published on: October 22, 2007
Read More
  • Newer
  • 1
  • …
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • …
  • 158
  • Older
1300 McGee Dr Ste. 112, Norman, Oklahoma 73072 1.888.621.7484
CONSUMER RESOURCES
  • Find an Attorney
  • Blog Posts
  • Helpful Links
  • James E. Beckley Law Student Scholarship
MEMBER RESOURCES
  • Membership Benefits
  • Membership Tiers
  • Calendar
  • Expert Advertising
ABOUT PIABA
  • Background
  • Upcoming Meetings & Events
  • Past Meetings & Events
  • Contact Us
NEWS/ADVOCACY
  • News Article
  • Press Releases
  • Blog
  • Advocacy
  • Briefs
  • Comment Letters
  • Reports & Op Eds
Copyright ©2025 PIABA All Rights Reserved Website Powered By KRUSH
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Member / Expert Log-in

By logging into the members only section of this site, I affirm that I am in compliance with eligibility requirements for a PIABA members as outlined in Article IV Section 3 of the PIABA Bylaws.

Did you forget your password?

Not Registered Yet?

Register as a Member!   Register as an Expert!

Preloader

Back to login

I affirm that I am in compliance with eligibility requirements for a PIABA members as outlined in Article IV Section 3 of the PIABA Bylaws.
This provision states: Section 3.
Eligibility.
(a) A person shall be eligible for Regular Membership upon satisfaction of all of the following criteria:

(1) Demonstration of their status as an attorney at law and a member in good standing of the bar of any state or U.S. territory; and

(2) At least 80 percent of their legal and professional work as an attorney or as an expert witness involving securities industry/customer disputes is performed on behalf of customers, and at least 80 percent of their law firm’s legal and professional work as an attorney or as an expert witness involving securities industry/customer disputes is performed on behalf of customers. For purposes of determining whether a person meets this requirement:

a. “Securities industry/customer disputes” shall mean disputes between investors, on the one hand, and any one or more of the following, on the other: securities and commodities industry participants (licensed or unlicensed), securities issuers, financial counselors, and persons alleged to have liability for the acts or omissions of any of the foregoing.

b. The percentage of the Regular Member’s or prospective Regular Member’s work and the percentage of their law firm’s work in securities industry/customer disputes shall be the percentage of hours spent rather than the percentage of revenues generated or any other measure; and the relevant time period for determining that percentage shall run from the date twelve months preceding the date on which the determination is made to the date on which the determination is made, inclusive.

If the prospective Member is an employee of or partner with a Regular Member in good standing, the time period for determining the percentage shall run from the date of hire or entry into partnership, so long as at least six months have passed between that date and the date of application. The prospective Member’s work performed before joining the existing Member’s firm will not be taken into consideration when determining the existing Member’s continued eligibility during the first six months of the prospective Member’s employment by or partnership with the existing Member. The prospective Member’s work performed while employed by or partnered with the existing Member shall be taken into consideration in determining the existing Member’s continued eligibility.

(b) Subject to approval by the Board, a person who does not represent investors in the United States shall be eligible for Regular Membership if that person is a Member in good standing of the legal profession in a nation outside of the United States and meets the requirements of Section 3(a)(2) above.

(c) If, at the time of application for membership, an attorney does not represent any customers in securities industry/customer disputes, the attorney shall be eligible for Regular

Page 2 of 21 PIABA Bylaws, Adopted [May 15, 2024]

Membership, provided that neither the attorney nor the attorney’s law firm, at the time of application for membership, or in the 12 months prior to application, is performing or performed any legal or professional work, including work as an attorney or as an expert witness, in a securities industry/customer dispute against a customer. Further, if admitted pursuant to this paragraph, upon the Attorney’s acceptance any legal and professional work, including work as an attorney and as an expert witness, in a securities industry/customer dispute, the Attorney shall certify compliance with Section 3(a)(2).

(d) The eligibility requirements for the five other classes of Membership are set forth in Article IV, Sections 5 through 9.

  • Find an Attorney
  • Upcoming Events